Wuthering Heights: Movie Review
Cast: Margot Robbie, Jacob Elordi, Alison Oliver, Martin Clunes, Shazad Latif
Director: Emerald Fennell
The long-awaited Wuthering Heights remake emerges onto the cinematic screen in a mixture of would-be Gothic grotesquerie and lust.
The 2026 version of the Emily Bronte
classic opens with a dark screen, the sound of creaking and moaning bleeding
from the speakers.
It’s meant to signify something
seductive and illicit, but director Emerald Fennell’s penchant for misdirection
here kicks in and the film lures you in, promising one thing and delivering
another.
And yet, in many ways, as it takes
on the tale of revenge-fuelled would-be lovers Cathy and Heathcliff, the
overlong film follows a more traditional route than the time-swapping narrative
and leans into the snark and dark humour among the pastel-filled fever dream
that Fennell created with Promising Young Woman and Saltburn.
Early scenes focus on Heathcliff
being brought into Wuthering Heights by Cathy’s monstrous father (Doc Martin’s
Martin Clunes as you’ve never seen him) and their relationship developing as she
gets to keep him like a pet.
Fast-forward a few years and Cathy,
all petulance, pride and prissiness, is now grown-up (with Robbie inhabiting the
wide-eyed role) and at a loss with her lot in life. Worried her father’s
corraling and gambling has ruined them, and obsessed with the rich neighbours
that have moved in, she heads to meet the Lintons, before injuring herself and
unable to return for weeks.
When she does, she’s a changed
woman, one who seems more hellbent on pursuing her awakening desires until a
single moment separates her and Heathcliff for years…
“Wuthering Heights”, as Fennell has
deemed it, captures the lusty confused desire of teenage years and sets it
against the aesthetics that its director has become known for.
Vibrant colours burst out from the
screen as Cathy herself blooms and a dollhouse motif that’s used throughout
hints at her own frustrations in among the Gothic architecture and wind-swept
landscapes of the wild moor on her doorstep.
And yet, in amongst the sumptuous
visuals and thrillingly evocative score and solid performances, there’s little
to grasp onto for emotional depth here. Whether it’s deliberate or not, not
once does the tragedy of the piece feel like it’s come to the fore. Both Heathcliff
and Cathy are monstrous and selfish in their own ways, their obsessions fuelled
by a twisted revenge that only harms themselves, rather than those around them.
Lashings of humour outweigh the
growing sense of toxic nastiness – particularly Alison Oliver’s Lady Isabelle,
a girl lost and oblivious to the world around her, obsessed with dolls and
crafting them from people’s actual hair.
In truth, “Wuthering Heights” could
have lost maybe 20 minutes or so, and still have fit the director’s desires –
but its sex-fuelled desire and longing still feels as relevant today as it did
then – even if the film’s occasionally shallow take on the complexities of
Bronte’s work is lost to a 21st century audience.